Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: First Bus pulling out of Cornwall, 14.2.2026 In "Buses and other ways to travel" [380047/31133/5] Posted by ChrisB at 10:58, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
So how many RMT members are there already at Go Cornwall if many/most belong to Unite? Will they have much effect?
| Re: Cornish mainline and branch line delays - ongoing discussion In "Shorter journeys in Plymouth and Cornwall" [380046/28556/25] Posted by TaplowGreen at 10:55, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
Several branches seem to be taking a hammering again today - crew shortages, "more trains than usual in need of repair" etc
| Re: First Bus pulling out of Cornwall, 14.2.2026 In "Buses and other ways to travel" [380045/31133/5] Posted by GBM at 10:33, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
...
BUS union RMT has won a ballot for strike action over trade union recognition at Go Cornwall.
RMT members voted for strike action and action short of as Go Cornwall continue to refuse to recognise their union.
...
Source: RMTBUS union RMT has won a ballot for strike action over trade union recognition at Go Cornwall.
RMT members voted for strike action and action short of as Go Cornwall continue to refuse to recognise their union.
...
Can anyone explain what's going on here? Presumably Go Ahead recognise RMT elsewhere, so why not in Cornwall?
I believe Unite were/are representing GoCornwall members up to now.
(I can find this Unite piece, albeit from two years ago https://www.unitetheunion.org/news-events/news/2024/june/cornwall-facing-bus-chaos-as-drivers-ballot-for-strike-over-pay)
RMT represented First bus members.
There were a few RMT representatives who went well above and beyond to support their members, but also a few who were only in it for themselves - and were - allegedly, working with management for their own benefits. Personal opinion only with being a member in different depots over 14 years.
Seems like a union battle as to who represents the membership.
| Re: [OTD] 25th September 1977 - Launch of Skytrain In "Buses and other ways to travel" [380043/32537/5] Posted by Bob_Blakey at 10:00, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
One return trip on the Laker Skytrain DC-10 in late 1982 LGW > LAX. A work trip involving the testing of some new oil industry subsurface measurement equipment using the Wilmington Oilfield (Long Beach) artificial island boreholes.
My abiding memory of the (outbound) flight was the very unpleasant odour of atmospheric pollution in the cabin approaching Los Angeles.
| Why are buses getting slower? In "Buses and other ways to travel" [380041/32544/5] Posted by Red Squirrel at 08:49, 26th September 2026 Already liked by Fourbee | ![]() |
Quite a long article here, detailing how cycle lanes, road works, traffic and many other factors are slowing down buses in London and elsewhere:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-interactive/2026/sep/23/london-buses-in-terminal-decline-why-public-transport-in-global-cities-is-slowing-to-a-crawl-visualised
| Re: The opportunity that GBR offers In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [380040/32493/40] Posted by Electric train at 08:21, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
From Andrew Stephens on LinkedIn - 3,000 words precised down to about 100 in my review
I think he is right in his identification of the opportunity. The question is ... will the opportunity be taken?
A few days ago I wrote an article about Great British Railways that was, if I am being generous to myself, sceptical.
[snip]
The infrastructure will still need maintaining. Trains will still need servicing. Drivers will still drive them, signalling will still need operating, stations will still require people, electricity will still need buying and, unless somebody in Whitehall has been keeping a particularly exciting technical breakthrough quiet, rails, bridges, tunnels, embankments and overhead lines will continue to deteriorate when exposed to weather, weight and time.
[snip]
Perhaps the real opportunity is not in who owns the railway at all. Perhaps it is in finally removing some of the extraordinary amount of friction involved in running it.
[snip]
The infrastructure will still need maintaining. Trains will still need servicing. Drivers will still drive them, signalling will still need operating, stations will still require people, electricity will still need buying and, unless somebody in Whitehall has been keeping a particularly exciting technical breakthrough quiet, rails, bridges, tunnels, embankments and overhead lines will continue to deteriorate when exposed to weather, weight and time.
[snip]
Perhaps the real opportunity is not in who owns the railway at all. Perhaps it is in finally removing some of the extraordinary amount of friction involved in running it.
I think he is right in his identification of the opportunity. The question is ... will the opportunity be taken?
"Friction" is an extremely apt word. I wish I'd thought of describing it that way
Are you sure it's not a typo? In the context of the way the railways are owned/run perhaps "fiction" was intended?
During the railway privatisation process in the 1990's the word "tension" was used a lot. The DfT / Treasury /Government / John Major belief was that British Rail could not get to the (eutopia) subsidy free position that politically John Major's Conservative government wanted because it lacked commercial / competitive "tension".
By breaking BR up into 100 business this would create market forces tension which in turn would generate completion thereby driving costs down and improving efficiency and because of the competition between TOCs this would lead new train operators entering the UK rail market hence more train services all competition with each other ................ (what could possibly go wrong!)
The same model was used for maintenance and renewals multiple companies all bidding for the work, cost being driven down and efficiencies and performance improved by competitive tender process, Railtrack would be according to the Government at time be in the Fotsi 100 companies.
The contracts did have wonderful clause that included "collaborative working" "required to work collaboratively with" etc
All of the above was the essence of the internal propaganda being feed to the staff within BR at the time.
What actually happened within UK rail the tension changed to friction because the eutopia of a friendly collaborative environment was ultimately trumped the companies share holder dividend and the salaries of the Chairmen and CEO's etc. So yes the railways has been running for many years with a lot of friction.
It will be interesting to see if the performance of GWR / NR GW Route improves in the months after GWR is taken into public ownership when the commercial / contractual friction has been removed
| Re: To 'stockpile food' is now our Government's official policy, apparently In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380039/32456/31] Posted by TaplowGreen at 08:18, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
I’ll ask my usual question.
If it gets bad enough that the sensible choice is to hide in a bunker to survive, then what is the point in surviving the inevitable complete breakdown in society that would greet you when you emerge?
If it gets bad enough that the sensible choice is to hide in a bunker to survive, then what is the point in surviving the inevitable complete breakdown in society that would greet you when you emerge?
And even a nuclear attack is worth surviving if too close. A basic shelter reduces the radiation dose received to about one thousandth of that in the open.
...........and when you emerge, blinking into the horror of the aftermath, what then?
| Re: Special timetables - dry trackbed and leaf season In "The Lighter Side" [380038/32543/30] Posted by TaplowGreen at 08:14, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
Excuses, excuses. I can't speak for the whole country but in this neck of the woods the prolonged hot and dry summer has already produced significant premature leaf drop which will reduce the effect of the main event when it happens.
"More leaves than normal falling at the same time"
"More trees than usual needing repair at the same time"
| Re: Bus lanes to be scrapped (in Rotherham) In "The Lighter Side" [380037/32542/30] Posted by Bob_Blakey at 07:59, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
Given the current state of the UK's education system I was surprised that the 'University of Central Mexborough' was a spoof. It could have been on a par with Gower Street Polytechnic.

| Re: Special timetables - dry trackbed and leaf season In "The Lighter Side" [380036/32543/30] Posted by grahame at 07:56, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
Excuses, excuses. I can't speak for the whole country but in this neck of the woods the prolonged hot and dry summer has already produced significant premature leaf drop which will reduce the effect of the main event when it happens.
"More leaves than normal falling at the same time"
| Re: Special timetables - dry trackbed and leaf season In "The Lighter Side" [380035/32543/30] Posted by Bob_Blakey at 07:35, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
Excuses, excuses. I can't speak for the whole country but in this neck of the woods the prolonged hot and dry summer has already produced significant premature leaf drop which will reduce the effect of the main event when it happens.
| Re: To 'stockpile food' is now our Government's official policy, apparently In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [380034/32456/31] Posted by broadgage at 05:20, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
I’ll ask my usual question.
If it gets bad enough that the sensible choice is to hide in a bunker to survive, then what is the point in surviving the inevitable complete breakdown in society that would greet you when you emerge?
If it gets bad enough that the sensible choice is to hide in a bunker to survive, then what is the point in surviving the inevitable complete breakdown in society that would greet you when you emerge?
A bunker is not only against a nuclear attack. Also useful in case of extreme weather, conventional air raids, or civil disorder.
And even a nuclear attack is worth surviving if too close. A basic shelter reduces the radiation dose received to about one thousandth of that in the open.
| Re: Special timetables - dry trackbed and leaf season In "The Lighter Side" [380033/32543/30] Posted by bobm at 04:31, 26th September 2026 Already liked by grahame | ![]() |
| Special timetables - dry trackbed and leaf season In "The Lighter Side" [380032/32543/30] Posted by grahame at 03:55, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
We have the South Western Main line slowed because the clay of the trackbed is drying out, but I haven't heard about leaf fall season timetables yet this year. Have I been sleeping?

[url=https://www.facebook.com/dognamedstella/]Dog named Stella[/url] has 1 million followers!
Do you know if taxi drivers have to pay a fee to use Melksham station's forecourt?
I think 'forecourt' over-sells it 
https://maps.app.goo.gl/daWCKW6BJWBULCfB6
That's an old image. The white lines were recently refreshed (after we asked and were told no
- funny how things happen sometimes. Noticing TaplowGreen's comment about the picture of balloons near pylons in another thread)The paintwork on the road that looked like this ... has I think gone.

The disabled parking space is still there. A luggage locker has appeared though I have yet to see anyone using it. Swivel round on the Google view and you'll see the old cafe notices (view is July 2024) which could really do with an update. Station area "work in progress" in need of some TLC.
| Re: Checking on your train running just before you set off In "Introductions and chat" [380030/32503/1] Posted by grahame at 03:18, 26th September 2026 | ![]() |
so I'm not in the right frame of mind to write good code!
Jeez you still write code? I haven't done that for months, not since I got my Claude Code license. And Claude reviews it as well. What could possibly go wrong? 
Seriously, have you tried it? I'm (mostly) using Opus 5.5 in VSCode, and we have a very good working relationship. It really is amazing what it can do, and how little time it takes to do it.
Seriously
... no, and it's on my "must look at that" list.The majority of coding I do is tweaking / adjusting and it's not been something that's pushed me over the edge to try - just yet. And that from me who made a living / business of being ahead of the curve with innovative coding languages.
Episode 3 is available on YouTube, at https://youtu.be/j_C7ml7ZCIg?is=1xaa_R0j_nbcEVA3
| Re: Bath's park and ride from Lansdown, the 31 In "Buses and other ways to travel" [380025/32540/5] Posted by Mark A at 20:58, 25th September 2026 | ![]() |
... back to double deckers today.
| Bus lanes to be scrapped (in Rotherham) In "The Lighter Side" [380024/32542/30] Posted by grahame at 18:31, 25th September 2026 Already liked by Mark A, Bob_Blakey | ![]() |
From the Rotherham Bugle
Rotherham’s bus lanes look set to become a thing of the past next year after a study failed to find a single passenger who needed to be anywhere anytime soon.
The study, headed up by Professor Joseph Carr, head of Applied Passenger Logistics at the University of Central Mexborough, looked at hundreds of bus journeys spread over the first half of 2026 and concluded that there was nobody travelling by bus who was in any sort of hurry.
Article continues
The study, headed up by Professor Joseph Carr, head of Applied Passenger Logistics at the University of Central Mexborough, looked at hundreds of bus journeys spread over the first half of 2026 and concluded that there was nobody travelling by bus who was in any sort of hurry.
Article continues
| Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026 In "London to the Cotswolds" [380023/31371/14] Posted by charles_uk at 18:08, 25th September 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern due 18:26 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Evesham due 18:23 has been cancelled.
This is due to the train making extra stops because a train was cancelled.
18:51 Evesham to Oxford due 19:50 will be cancelled.
This is due to the train making extra stops because a train was cancelled.
19:02 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 21:28 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill due 00:01 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Evesham due 18:23 has been cancelled.
This is due to the train making extra stops because a train was cancelled.
18:51 Evesham to Oxford due 19:50 will be cancelled.
This is due to the train making extra stops because a train was cancelled.
19:02 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 21:28 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill due 00:01 will be cancelled.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
cancelled "due to the train making extra stops because a train was cancelled"

Absolutely. I have a lot of friends who are recently retired/still serving in the Police, and they find it endlessly frustrating in terms of the way their priorities have been changed - one common theme is that changing the name from the "Police Force" to the "Police service" had an enormous cultural impact beyond semantics, and by no means all positive.
By a very minor coincidence, last night I was watching the 2001 episode of "The Bill" police drama featuring the retirement party of "old-school" Sergeant Cryer; he makes a moving speech about the change from "Police Force" to "Police Service - a pointed dig at "new school" Superintendent Tom Chandler. Frustratingly the episode is missing from the Internet Archive but can be viewed here on u.co.uk One has to register.
(I'm working my way through all 2,300 episodes, and the above is number 1,593. By 2001 it had started to get silly, with various combinations of relationships between the police and a high death rate among them. It does have the merit of many scenes being filmed in and close to Docklands as it was re-developed from docks to yuppiedom.)
I used to drink in the Cross Keys in Hammersmith where several of the cast members were regulars. It was more notable though for the quality of its Fullers "Chiswick" ale, never an easy one to find but well worth seeking out!
| Re: Reported assaults on Britain's rail services rise by more than a third In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [380021/32536/51] Posted by Marlburian at 17:47, 25th September 2026 | ![]() |
Absolutely. I have a lot of friends who are recently retired/still serving in the Police, and they find it endlessly frustrating in terms of the way their priorities have been changed - one common theme is that changing the name from the "Police Force" to the "Police service" had an enormous cultural impact beyond semantics, and by no means all positive.
By a very minor coincidence, last night I was watching the 2001 episode of "The Bill" police drama featuring the retirement party of "old-school" Sergeant Cryer; he makes a moving speech about the change from "Police Force" to "Police Service" - a pointed dig at "new school" Superintendent Tom Chandler. Frustratingly the episode is missing from the Internet Archive but can be viewed here on u.co.uk One has to register.
(I'm working my way through all 2,300 episodes, and the above is number 1,593. By 2001 it had started to get silly, with various combinations of relationships between the police and a high death rate among them. It does have the merit of many scenes being filmed in and close to Docklands as it was re-developed from docks to yuppiedom.)
That's not far right though: when people quote 'Weekly pro-Palestinian hate marches in London' it's more a repetition of various tropes, boosted in this age of generational trauma.
Mark
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06 will be started from Swindon.
It will no longer call at Gloucester, Stonehouse, Stroud and Kemble.
This is due to a fault on a train earlier.
It will no longer call at Gloucester, Stonehouse, Stroud and Kemble.
This is due to a fault on a train earlier.














