This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Re-opening the Cowley branch to passenger traffic
In "London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury" [368586/27074/9]
Posted by Electric train at 06:16, 25th November 2025
Already liked by Chris from Nailsea
 
....the other factor to aid the case will the be decarbonising fright 

Had to record this typo before it got edited 

If you stand at track level freight is frightening 

Man dies after being hit by car on walk to station - Maghull, 22 October 2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368585/31156/51]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 05:13, 25th November 2025
 
From the BBC:


The incident happened on Station Road, Maghull, on 22 October

A man has died after he was hit by a car as he walked to a railway station on his way to work, police said.

The 51-year-old was walking towards Maghull railway station when he was hit by a black Range Rover Velar on Station Road, at the junction with Tailors Lane, on 22 October.

He was taken to hospital with serious injuries after the incident, which happened just before 07:00 BST, but he died on 7 November, police said.

A 64-year-old woman arrested at the scene on suspicion of causing death by careless driving and driving whilst unfit remains under investigation.

The family of the man, who is from Maghull, paid tribute to him. They said: "We are devastated by the tragic loss of life, following being hit by a car, on his regular walking journey to Maghull [Railway] Station and work. We are heartbroken that his life has been cut short and we have lost a brother, uncle, nephew and good friend."

They said he would be "forever in our hearts", and urged anyone who saw the incident to contact police.

Det Sgt Simon Duffy said: "We are determined to establish how this tragic incident occurred, and we are following numerous lines of enquiry to establish all the facts. Despite a suspect being identified, this investigation remains ongoing and we remain very keen to speak to anyone who may have witnessed the incident or was in the area at this time."

He added: "We know motorists were in the area. I would urge any drivers and pedestrians who were heading towards the nearby Maghull train station to come forward so we can establish if you may have relevant information."

He also asked people check dashcam footage "for any vital evidence which may help with our enquiries".


Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
In "London to the Cotswolds" [368584/29711/14]
Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 05:05, 25th November 2025
 
Tuesday November 25

As flagged up above, but still (05:00) unreported on Journeycheck, both the first two trains are short-formed as five-car sets this morning - both 1P11 0516 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington (07:24) and 1P02 05:23 Hereford to London Paddington (08:24).

Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years.
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368583/31150/31]
Posted by infoman at 04:39, 25th November 2025
 
Trying to put that 115 feet in to perspective.

So if we say the height of ceilings in a terraced house is eight feet

so if we take into account a two story house that's 24 feet.

That would be mean FIVE terraced house's on top of one another,

that's quite some distance to pile down.   

Re: Caersws railway bridge that keeps being driven into 'has cost taxpayers £50k'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368582/31149/51]
Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 22:41, 24th November 2025
 
"A bridge that has been hit 12 times by drivers over nearly two years in "avoidable" incidents has cost taxpayers £50,000 in repairs"

What a silly intro. The bridge hasn't cost taxpayers anything. Drivers who are unable to read signs have.

Re: Re-opening the Cowley branch to passenger traffic
In "London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury" [368581/27074/9]
Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 22:32, 24th November 2025
 
I haven't seen this posted elsewhere, but apparently this is the infra work planned as part of the Cowley reopening:

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
In "London to the Cotswolds" [368580/29711/14]
Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 22:30, 24th November 2025
 
RTT reports that 1W11 0553 Pad to Gt Malvern was cancelled, "unknown cause"

As (obviously) was the return journey, which was the one I was going to catch into Oxford. I'd swear I was cursed were it not for the fact that a friendly conductor the other day asked "Have all the trains you've been on this week been delayed, or is it just me?"

Re: Tarka Line - Exeter to Barnstaple: merged topics - services, facilities, incidents and events -
In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [368579/15711/24]
Posted by trainbuff at 22:22, 24th November 2025
 
Yes indeed. Brent Mill Viaduct

Re: Caersws railway bridge that keeps being driven into 'has cost taxpayers £50k'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368578/31149/51]
Posted by John D at 21:27, 24th November 2025
 
To raise an old question again.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money?  Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.

It is natural for the Highways authorities and Network Rail to contract and pay for the repairs initially - I would not want it to be up to the [insert words] driving the log lorry to engage people and manage the show - (s)he has caused concern that (s)he can't even drive in a safe manner.     Having said which - yes - it costs Network Rail and the experts as Rebecca Watling has pointed out - but I would hope that she (or, rather her team) can then present the bill onward to the driver and his/her insurer.  I wonder if any expert here can tell us what the cost will be to Network Rail  ... and how much of that they claim back.

Yes - it will cost the public purse.  But then the public pure should be getting it back ....

Network Rail should be able to recover all their costs from the lorry company (or their insurers) assuming they are caught.  And clearly this one wasn't able to run away.   Their costs would include any compensation to a train operator.

Fire service cannot charge for attending road accidents, but ambulance service can recover cost of any treatment they give. Police can charge for removal and storage of vehicles causing a hazard.  Breakdown and Recovery services will also charge the driver or their insurers.

train operators delay repay payouts are based on percentages of ticket values, not the amount from Network Rail, so could be cost (or a gain) to this part of public purse.

Ultimately the public will end up paying for time and inconvenience of consequential delays as indirect costs are usually not recoverable.

Re: Annoying / amusing use of completely irrelevant stock photos to illustrate press articles
In "The Lighter Side" [368577/11558/30]
Posted by grahame at 21:02, 24th November 2025
Already liked by Chris from Nailsea
 
From Time Out




Watford has been feeling the impact of cuts to its bus services in recent years. Now, a group of locals say that the Hertfordshire town’s transport system needs expanding, and have started a petition asking the council to commit to reopening a long-disused train station.

Watford West was last used as a railway station in 1996, nearly 30 years ago. It continued as a bus stop until 2003, when it was shut completely. In the subsequent decades it became rusty and overgrown, then was cleared in preparation for the ultimately doomed Croxley Link.

Re: Caersws railway bridge that keeps being driven into 'has cost taxpayers £50k'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368576/31149/51]
Posted by Mark A at 20:58, 24th November 2025
 
Not particularly relevant, but, looking at the photo in the article, it's not impossible that the roundel mounted on the bridge and stating the clearance is the same one recorded by Google Streetview in 2024 as mounted on a pole beside the bridge. (The height notice on the other side of the bridge is triangular.)

Streetview shows the signage there (not only bridge height related) has been revised several times in the last ten years.

Also, wondering where the start/end points for that delivery would have been. If it happened to be Kronospan at Chirk, wouldn't have thought that it would have taken the load up the A470.

Mark


Re: First Bus pulling out of Cornwall, 14.2.2026
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [368575/31133/5]
Posted by LiskeardRich at 19:59, 24th November 2025
 
What of the rest of First South West? I can't see the Somerset operation standing on its own two feet.

Will the Somerset operation be folded into First West of England, or maybe First Hampshire & Dorset.

Cornwall and Somerset were folded into Berkshire, Hampshire and Dorset just before I left the business. I left in April 2023. They all fall into a new large opco called First South with common management. The current management team are mostly based in Hampshire and Berkshire

Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield?
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368574/30854/31]
Posted by grahame at 19:47, 24th November 2025
 
I was under the impression that scrap dealers had to be licenced now, and there needed to be a paper trail of where they obtained stuff therefore, they can't allowed tout for business anymore.

We have one who visits Melksham too.  I don't think there's any problem about touting for business - just that they have to be licensed to pass in afterwards, and perhaps have to complete loads of paperwork for each pickup.

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
In "London to the Cotswolds" [368573/29711/14]
Posted by charles_uk at 19:46, 24th November 2025
 
And there are short-forms this evening too:

And ominously for tomorrow morning:
Facilities on the 22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway Hl due 01:06.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:46

And also, not mentioned on JourneyCheck, the 1953 Paddington to Hereford is another short form which will mean tomorrow's 0523 Hereford to Paddington service likely to be a short-form as well.

Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield?
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368572/30854/31]
Posted by plymothian at 19:33, 24th November 2025
 
I was under the impression that scrap dealers had to be licenced now, and there needed to be a paper trail of where they obtained stuff therefore, they can't allowed tout for business anymore.

Re: Working on the server today
In "News, Help and Assistance" [368571/31138/29]
Posted by grahame at 18:53, 24th November 2025
 
I have been applying a few licks of paint in the last few hours, and will be continuing to fiddle during the day - including things like https certificates.   [etc]

From 2004 to about 2018, I wrote over 4,600 blog articele on "The Horse's Mouth" and they have been slowly gathering dust with occasional views on what is now our backroom/worker server.     I have now added a lick of paint so that they come up secure (https rather than http) and any shares on Facebook and Bluesky will correctly pick up images and titles.

Here's am example link: https://www.wellho.info/mouth/2457_Railway-Arithmetic.html. showing how a doubling of the very thin train service we had in those days would raise the number of day return opportunities form 1 to 8

Railway Arithmetic (written 2009-10-16)

1 + 1 = 1 If you have an early morning round trip out and back to a residential / suburb, and a similar evening round trip, you're just providing a single commute opportunity to the origin point of the train.

2 + 2.5 = 8 If you take the two round trips of the first example, and add two more round trips (plus - in my example - an extra single journey) you can increase the commute opportunities from one to eight (yes, 125% more trains - 700% more journey options).

How does this work? Let's see my example







Plenty of navigation in the archive already - much more to be added.   But be aware that lots of external links will be to pages no longer available, and many of the internal links have not yet had that lick of paint. In the future, indexes and searches can bring in these pages.

Re: Caersws railway bridge that keeps being driven into 'has cost taxpayers £50k'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368570/31149/51]
Posted by grahame at 18:26, 24th November 2025
 
To raise an old question again.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money?  Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.

It is natural for the Highways authorities and Network Rail to contract and pay for the repairs initially - I would not want it to be up to the [insert words] driving the log lorry to engage people and manage the show - (s)he has caused concern that (s)he can't even drive in a safe manner.     Having said which - yes - it costs Network Rail and the experts as Rebecca Watling has pointed out - but I would hope that she (or, rather her team) can then present the bill onward to the driver and his/her insurer.  I wonder if any expert here can tell us what the cost will be to Network Rail  ... and how much of that they claim back.

Yes - it will cost the public purse.  But then the public pure should be getting it back ....

Re: Advertising of misleading minimum pricing which is scarcely available
In "Fare's Fair" [368569/31116/4]
Posted by grahame at 18:14, 24th November 2025
 
Here's an example I question ... "from £48" is the big headline.  I took a look and I found that price or better (for the passenger) with only limited avaiabilty, and only from Euston on the 05:31 on Fridays.








Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield?
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368568/30854/31]
Posted by johnneyw at 18:12, 24th November 2025
 
It's a similar story to CfN's with me.  In the wider Johnneyw Towers locale there seems to be a fairly regular lorry that goes around picking up scrap metal.  Items picked up from my drive over the years include an old TV Ariel, worn out wok and other pots and pans amongst other things.  It seems to be the same outfit that covers not only Redland but a fairy wide area.

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
In "London to the Cotswolds" [368567/29711/14]
Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 17:36, 24th November 2025
 
And there are short-forms this evening too:
Facilities on the 15:18 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington due 17:29.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:48

Facilities on the 17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street due 20:11.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:48

Facilities on the 20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington due 23:40.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:48

And ominously for tomorrow morning:
Facilities on the 22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway Hl due 01:06.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9. There are no reservations on this service.
Last Updated:24/11/2025 14:46

Re: Tarka Line - Exeter to Barnstaple: merged topics - services, facilities, incidents and events -
In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [368566/15711/24]
Posted by a-driver at 17:14, 24th November 2025
Already liked by trainbuff
 
He wants to addres the ridiculous amounts of rain/climate change then, not the railway....


And ... flooded again

08:35 Barnstaple to Exeter Central due 09:47
and all trains until mid afternoon

08:35 Barnstaple to Exeter Central due 09:47 has been cancelled.
This is due to flooding.

Not so long ago there was regularly issues with high water levels in the South Brent area closing the up line between Plymouth and Totnes, this seems to have been resolved so no doubt with permission from the Environment Agency this problem can similarly be resolved. 

Re: Caersws railway bridge that keeps being driven into 'has cost taxpayers £50k'
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368562/31149/51]
Posted by eXPassenger at 16:51, 24th November 2025
Already liked by Mark A
 
To raise an old question again.
Why has it cost taxpayers this money?  Surely the cost should have claimed from the vehicle owners and their insurance companies.

Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield?
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368561/30854/31]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 16:51, 24th November 2025
 
Here in Nailsea, we have the benefit of a latter-day Steptoe & Son, who drive along our road every week in their pickup truck with a loudhailer asking for 'any old iron?'

They aren't choosy - any scrap metal will do (I noticed that the only thing they didn't want was a neighbour's old fridge/freezer).

We don't have to do anything, other than put our unwanted metal items out on the drive, where they can be seen from the road.  Even if we don't hear the loudhailer (unlikely), they will come to the front door, just to confirm, "Is that to go?".

Recently, we updated our cooker and removed a redundant overhead extractor fan unit. My daughter and I will put those out on the drive and see how long it takes Steptoe & Son to snap them up. 


Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years.
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368560/31150/31]
Posted by bobm at 16:30, 24th November 2025
 
That’s of little comfort to those people who are still having to traipse along the road from the temporary bus terminus at Osney Island. 

Re: Recycling rubbish - something of a minefield?
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368559/30854/31]
Posted by Marlburian at 16:23, 24th November 2025
Already liked by johnneyw, Surrey 455, eightonedee
 
Earlier this year I bought a new microwave from John Lewis and understood from the company website that it would take my old one for re-cycling. Not so, said the salesperson.  My council offers some sort of limited collection service for heavier items, but it's always fully booked.

Then I discovered that Curry's would accept that sort of thing, even if it hadn't been purchased from them, and would even give a £5 voucher (IIRC) against a purchase.

A week after I'd handed in my microwave, another one was fly-tipped close to my house. For a while, no-one did anything about it, though my neighbour said that he'd reported it to the council. Eventually I took it to Curry's - for another voucher.

Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years.
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368558/31150/31]
Posted by ChrisB at 16:11, 24th November 2025
 
On time since they commenced that piling.

It was shifting the underground utilities that over ran.....

Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years.
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368557/31150/31]
Posted by bobm at 16:07, 24th November 2025
 
40m piling being used for the Oxford Botley Road bridge.

….and we all know how long that’s taking.

Re: Shrewsbury train station bus stop suspended over safety concerns
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [368556/31153/51]
Posted by ChrisB at 16:05, 24th November 2025
 
By the time that the driver has put the ramp out for a wheelchair, there won't be enough space for the wheelchair to line up to board the ramp without backing off into the cycle lane.

The contractors ought to have stopped & reported to the authority when finding the underground utilities....

Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years.
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368555/31150/31]
Posted by ChrisB at 15:57, 24th November 2025
 
40m piling being used for the Oxford Botley Road bridge.

Re: Winterstoke railway bridge, Weston super mare closed for two years.
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [368554/31150/31]
Posted by John D at 15:33, 24th November 2025
 
Replacement bridge requires piling to 35 metres depth.

Mark

35m is 115 feet, that is very long.   

Normal size piling rigs would not be able to handle augers or insert the steel (either sheet or rebar cage) of that length.  Sounds like specialist equipment will be needed

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025